Season 2010-11

A little note on de Jong. The incident on Sunday was very unfortunate, hes a combative player but he isnt dirty, he got the ball and his trailing leg took the leg of ban arfa, just very unlucky, I hope the lad makes a full recovery and that de jong doesnt alter the way he plays because of it.
(for everyone else - JJ & I spoke of this on the weekend)

I disagree... as does his national team coach!
He was dropped specifically because of his dirty tackling!
From the kung fu kick at the World Cup to a couple of seriously bonecrunching tackles at Citeh. He's a hazard. Good hardman player. But a hazard.
 
Ok the challenge in the World Cup Final was ridiculous

But in the Stuart Holden and Ben Arfa incident, the ball was there to be won, his feet were on the floor, he went in with one leg, hes a tough player, some of the stuff you see in the prem where players dont get injured are much worse. And in both cases the refs took no action, nor was there any retrospective punishments.
 
We were sat in level 2 right in front of the incident and you heard the snap of bone, it sounded awful !
 
The tackle was honest by DeJong, but saying that he is a dirty player and makes plenty of ankle questionable plays on players not the ball.
 
never been sent of for us and not been booked too many times either

Bolton's United States midfielder Stuart Holden suffered a fractured right fibula on international duty in March after a challenge from De Jong.

This and the karate kick are just some big examples. What you get away with still makes you a dirty player.
 
Bolton's United States midfielder Stuart Holden suffered a fractured right fibula on international duty in March after a challenge from De Jong.

This and the karate kick are just some big examples. What you get away with still makes you a dirty player.

he isnt a "dirty" player though. Hes combative, strong and committed but those attributes dont make you dirty. the world cup final incident should have been a straight red, no doubt about it. But he shouldnt be judged on every challenge hes made since then. Both the ben arfa and holden incidents were terribly unfortunate, but in both incidents he made hard, fair challenges, which are part of football, for now anyway, I fear they wont be for much longer if the "no contact" lobby get their way
 
nothing was said when barton then went flying in studs up on de jong straight after and proceeded to try a go through every city player when given the chance
watching AJ waltz past him to get the winner was worth the price of the season ticket!!
 
Watching him I think he could pull back a bit. once an accident, twice worrying, and three times a habit. I stand by what I said; even his national team mate who defended him says he needs to pull back a bit. The studs up tackles should be straight reds along with diving anywhere on the pitch. It would make the game more enjoyable.:lol:
 
:lol:

I think he means follow-through on tackles!

What, he shi7s himself ?


On a side, it appears the Yank cowboys Hicks and Gillett are being ousted by the board. They have accepted an offer from the New England sports ventures group who own the Boston red sox amongst others.

Apparently the majority of the board are happy they will meet the criteria set out by them, ie pay off the debts and commit to a new stadium and investment in the team.

Fingers crossed !!
 
They won't take the deal.

If the offers are around GBP 300 mil. as reported, that's half of what they were looking for. It would barely cover debt repayment.
 
They won't take the deal.

If the offers are around GBP 300 mil. as reported, that's half of what they were looking for. It would barely cover debt repayment.

That's it mate, they've got no choice. They have been out voted 3-2 by the rest of the board. They havent been able to re finance the club mainly due to a huge campaign by fans ( http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/danroan/2010/09/liverpool_fans_take_fight_onli.html)
And now a bid has been accepted which means they walk away with not very much. There will probably be some legal fights, but basically having tried to over throw the board in the last few days, they seem to have lost.

Thank fcuk :lol:



Wouldnt say amusing (maybe for a non supporting southerner). I'd say spot on, but then only a supporter from the area can appreciate the content of the video.

Thanks for posting it.
 
Watching him I think he could pull back a bit. once an accident, twice worrying, and three times a habit. I stand by what I said; even his national team mate who defended him says he needs to pull back a bit. The studs up tackles should be straight reds along with diving anywhere on the pitch. It would make the game more enjoyable.:lol:

That would be the personification of fairplay that is Van Bommel?? :lol:
 
Q&A with LFC chairman re the new owners. For those who might be interested :lol:



Liverpool FC Chairman Martin Broughton has spoken about why he believes New England Sports Ventures are the perfect fit for LFC and why he's confident the sale decision could be completed by close of business next week.
broughton263.jpg



In an exclusive interview with LFC TV, Broughton also thanked fans for their patience during the sales process and outlined the potential new owner's plans for the club.
Martin, it's been quite a dramatic 24 hours in terms of the sales process. Can you explain exactly what the situation is right now?
It certainly has been dramatic. The latest position is that we have a sale agreement in place, we've agreed the sale to New England Sports Ventures, that sale is subject to a number of conditions like Premier League approval and other normal conditions. The specific additional condition is that it's subject to confirmation that the Board acted validly in drawing up the sale documents.
Last night fans read a statement on the official website claiming that the owners had sought to remove Christian Purslow and Ian Ayre from the Board. What was the reasoning behind this and were the owners successful?
The court will ultimately decide whether the owners were successful. The reasoning behind it was that the owners felt we were reviewing two bids which they considered undervalued the club and therefore they wished to remove Christian and Ian and replace them with Mack Hicks, who is Tom's son, and Lori McCutcheon, who also works with him.
We don't think it was valid to do it. Essentially when I took the role they gave a couple of written undertakings to Royal Bank of Scotland. Those written undertakings included that I was the only person entitled to change the board and that was written into the articles of the covenants, and also that they would take no action to frustrate any reasonable sale. And I think they flagrantly abused both of those written undertakings.
You announced on Tuesday night that the club received two excellent offers. Why, in your opinion, is New England Sports Ventures the right new owner for Liverpool Football Club?
I think both of them would have been excellent new owners. New England have a lot of experience in developing, investing in and taking Boston Red Sox - as the closest parallel - from being a club with a wonderful history, a wonderful tradition that had lost the winning way, and bringing it back to being a winner. Their commitment to winning is what it's all about there and they've extended it from Boston Red Sox to Nascar and other things, but Red Sox is the main one.
I have been meeting them now for several weeks in Boston, in Liverpool, in London, and I feel they are totally committed to supporting and getting the winning mentality back into the team.
Is their winning mentality the thing which has impressed you most about them during this period?
Yes. Their commitment is to winning on the pitch and that helps you win off the pitch too. The two are mutually reinforcing.
Fans have already got lots of questions, with three of the main ones being:
a) Will the debt burden be removed completely?
To all intents and purposes, yes. All of the acquisition debt that was involved in the current owners acquisition will be removed completely. We'll still have what we call normal working capital debt and there's a facility there for the new stadium which will remain in place, but to all intents and purposes all the major debt that has been causing our problem has been paid off.
b) Have the proposed new owners committed to investing in the playing squad?
Yes. They don't want any hostages to fortune, very sensibly, so they're not going to make any comments about how much or anything like that. But this goes back to the winning mentality. I think the demonstration is: let's look at what they have done at Boston, what they said in Boston, what they have done in terms of investing in players - and I think you get a high degree of confidence of their willingness to do that.
c) Is there a commitment from them to progress the new stadium project?
Yes, there's definitely a commitment to invest in a stadium and we will finish up with a 60,000+ seater stadium. Where they haven't finalised their view is whether that should be the new stadium or whether there are still opportunities to build at Anfield itself. They have done both. The people involved have built the new stadium at Baltimore Orioles, for example, and at Fenway Park they looked at the two options and decided that actually redevelopment with all of the tradition was better than a new stadium. So they have done both, they are committed to looking at both very professionally and seeing which is the best option, but there will be stadium development.
Just to clarify, what needs to happen now for the sale to be finalised?
The key thing is the court case. We need to go to the court to get a declaratory judgement, which is for the court to declare that we did act validly in completing the sale agreement, and then the buyers can complete the sale. We have to get Premier League approval and I'm certain that's not going to be an issue. There are one or two minor things like that but the key issue is the court, which should meet I would think next week sometime. That is the most likely time, in short order.
Can the owners block the sale of LFC to New England Sports Ventures?
Well, we have to win the court case. So effectively yes, if they win the court case they can block the sale. But then we may have one or two other thoughts in mind as well.
Could the sale process be dragged through the courts for months before a resolution is reached?
No, I don't think so. We should get a declaratory judgement I would have thought probably by the end of next week, in short order. There is an appeal process but that is also very fast.

How confident are you that Liverpool Football Club will soon be officially under new ownership?
I am confident. I wouldn't have taken the Board through that process yesterday if I hadn't been confident. I wouldn't have exposed everybody to that risk if I hadn't been confident, but you can never be certain. These things are legal judgements. We have been properly advised and I am confident.
Looking back, how thorough has the process been to identify the best new owners for the Club and how pleased are you with the final outcome?
Ideally one would have had buyers who were not only the best buyers but also satisfied the owners. That's what we were looking for and we haven't managed to do that second piece of it. Has it been exhaustive? Absolutely. We have, first of all through BarCap, contacted every plausible buyer. The media coverage has meant that you would have to be living on Planet Zog not to know that Liverpool was for sale and so if you had any interest in it you had the opportunity. We've talked to lots of potential people. At the end of the day, with the deadline for debt repayment looming we had two bidders, both very viable bidders. I think they were competing, there was competitive tension there and I think that demonstrates that we have the market price.
Finally Martin, what is your message to the Liverpool fans?
Keep the faith. We said we would deliver the best buyers for the club and I think we have delivered exactly that. I know they've been frustrated by not getting a running commentary and I know a fan wants to know what's going on. I thank them for their patience because I do believe the only way you really get these things done is out of the media glare and it's difficult to do it out of the media glare, but we've found the right owners. I thank them for their patience, their support, keep the faith, this is going to work. They're with us
 
Redknapp opening his saggy trap again:rolleyes:


"In all of this, I have utmost sympathy for the Reds' owners, George Gillett and Tom Hicks.
"All they seem to have done is plough a fortune into the place and they stand to lose a fortune when they sell it. But, for all that, all they get is grief week-in, week-out.
"It's not their fault the expensive players who have been brought in are not performing as they should be. The Liverpool team is full of world-class talent and some costly flops.
"Hicks and Gillett wrote cheques for star striker Fernando Torres and Dirk Kuyt, a member of Holland's World Cup final squad. Alberto Aquilani cost £20 million and has been a disaster - but is that the owners' fault?"

:rolleyes: Obviously Saggy is missing the point. He's a class "A" cnut :evil:
 
Back
Top