FlatErik
Well-Known Member
I think I expanded on this already quite a few times but...Some of these posts are just mesmerising, must be the only one who enjoys reading the sheer absurdity of some of this haha
one thing that intrigues me most about elrow’s argument is - what could the motivation for governments possibly be for them to force uneccesary lockdowns or vaccine passports etc on their populations? What incentive could they possibly have? Has only weakened just about every leader I can think of apart from 1 or 2 very notable exceptions.
Fear, tunnel vision, confirmation bias, holding on to your first taken action - there's no way back (you can't say: oh that lockdown was not a good idea, sorry for the economical loss!), reputation, political motives (say your party cut heavily on healthcare for the past x years...), there's a EU pact to keep measures up until vaccination is completed because they spent billions on them, power, control over your population, an economic reset / leveling of income, gaining position in big companies such as airlines through state aid, pressure from other world leaders.
I also think power you gain...is really hard to give back. How much other advantages for governmental bodies float to the surface with the measures they implemented. An evening curfew and people staying mostly at home will definitely have an impact on crime. Less robberies, less burglaries. No bars, no clubs...no fights or drunken people out in the street causing trouble. And a vaccine passport is quite handy cause it also registers where you travel, what festival you visit. Freedom only seems to be "bought back" under conditions.
There's so much to think of without having to put a thin foil hat on.
But it's mostly just as mass fear driven tunnelvision event, a lot of scientist are already researching this.