His opinion of the majority of poor people is another debate.
That is exactly the debate...
His opinion of the majority of poor people is another debate.
Say if I've based my observations of 100 people in each category I think it would be fair to say this represents a fair assessment of society in general.
The remainder (also a 'large proportion') are rich, poor for other reasons which I'm sure we all agree needs some rebalancing and yes, that's where government needs to take control.
That is exactly the debate...
Then debate that and don't assume things and make unfounded allegations...
I quoted him...
in the not too distant future when we ALL get replaced by robots, any remaining work ethic will go out the window
@spinksy123 Pal, look at what he said about poor people. Look. Utter bellend comment
@spinksy123 Pal, look at what he said about poor people. Look. Utter bellend comment
I think @spinksy123 is bang on the kool aid?
countless surveys of (legit) employers find that migrants are preferred to local workers for having better attitude/work ethic - the reason certain low-end sectors need people from thousands of miles away is that local kids turn their nose up at those jobs (same story across western world
Also the very first post referenced people being nice etc to others on this forum. Calling people an arse, wank and utter bellend because they've viewed an opinion you don't agree with isn't in my opinion really needed.
https://digitalsynopsis.com/inspiration/privileged-kids-on-a-plate-pencilsword-toby-morris/
Says it all. I work really hard, always have. I dug holes when in my school holidays, worked in Uni holidays and even when I started full time employment after Uni, I went labouring at the weekends to get ahead.
Sounds like I really did it for myself, doesn't it? But no actually, that was my internship. My old man came here from Ireland at 15, leaving a broken home, no education, no parental support, but there was at least an abundance of labouring work. Eventually he built himself a business, which gave me the opportunities I describe above.
And that privilege given my Autistic son an advantage that equally deserving child without my start in life won't get. My son had 40 hours a therapy a week for the last two years, paid for by me. The state offered 4 half hour speech therapy sessions every six months. And that's now, before the Tories have completely stripped the NHS for their buddies. My son has moved from 'profound and severe' to 'moderate' between the ages of 2 and 4, with adequate resources and educated parents. An equally deserving child not born to privilege will be shitting in nappies when he's 20.
And that's what your voting for if you vote Tory. To abandon the vulnerable to chance of birth, where, to whom and with what defects.
I'm seeing the rise of homelessness and addiction to hard drugs on the streets of my leafy London surburbs. I'm seeing the mentally ill roaming the streets uncared for. This isn't some abstract other world where a work ethic will give most people a chance to be comfortable.
I don't particularly care for Labour's apparent incompetence, but siding against that with an elite that treats the majority of people with utter contempt? Deadly contempt for many? Nah, not for me.
Vote tactically against the Tories or know that you are voting for the effective murder of the disabled, the elderly and the sick. You abandon too their carers, to a life without respite, somehow making ends meet, exhausted from personally providing a round the clock service the state could easily afford were the elite willing to forgo such a trivial amount to them that they wouldn't even notice.
Take a look at yourself. Who do you want to be?
I'm so pleased your son has made such good progress, wishing you and him lots of luck and love.
The remainder (also a 'large proportion') are rich, poor for other reasons which I'm sure we all agree needs some rebalancing and yes, that's where government needs to take control. First on hit list are rappers, footballers and boy/girl bands lol