Really well. Check the current situation.How did that work out again?
Yes I do.Why do you constantly ignore in the UK ICU is at breaking point and capacity is dangerously full?
Do you really think if there were not lockdown measures in place that there would be no extra people requiring ICU beds?
If you feel the civil unrest and the lack of support for the measures is about money, then you missed the point.
If you read what I wrote, my point is I'll go with huge majority of experts. I acknowledge that there are some experts who disagree. But I'm not an expert, so it would be ludricous for me to seek out the minority of experts who might offer the opinion that suits my personal circumstancesThis might be a nice Twitter thread full of source material for you if you're interested in what experts say about lockdowns:
If you read the articles I posted that gives you a solid understanding on what experts say on the cancer plan.It isn't hard
Vaccinate a huge number of people in their 60s, reduce pressure on ICU , save a moderate amount of lives
Vaccinate a huge number of people in their 80s then 70s, reduce pressure on wards and ambulances and save a huge number of lives
So, you're cancer plan? I'm still trying to have my polite discussion with you. You complain about being 'shouted down' but then wont discuss you're idea
If it's about mental wellbeing then I have even less sympathy. Go spend a week being bombed by Assad and you'll understand what trauma is. Some of those in their 90s and 100s have lived through two World Wars FFS, Nazi concentration camps etc. so worrying that baba hasn't seen his friends enough or is having to stay at home playing gameboy instead of socialising. or that mumsie is having to try to home school for a few more weeks with an end in sight inside a year just doesn't stand up to reasonable tests.
hmm, I think we can't just dismiss depression as some trivial first world problem. I know a lot of people who have really struggled and one took his life last year. you can't just say, 'ahh well could be worse, at least you're not a refugee' because each individual case is unique and no less invalid.
where I think El Row comes at this wrong is in assuming that despair at the general situation equates to anger at specific policy. everyone's fed up. it's just a case of holding tight...
If you can undermine every aspect, newsflash, it ain't very goodI usually find discussing with you enjoyable, but a discussion is not trying to get me to have a detailled plan so you can try to undermine every aspect of the plan. I think both the article of the 4 ICU doctors and the head of the ICU Amsterdam VUMC cover my arguments pretty well.
The government hasn't decided that, in the UK at least can't speak for elsewhere but doubt it very much. The government doesnt micromanage how hospitals runIf you read the articles I posted that gives you a solid understanding on what experts say on the cancer plan.
They want to have a fair choice again between let's say giving a covid patient a few extra months vs discovering and treating cancer to give someone extra years. Right now they don't have that choice cause the government decides that Covid goes before anything, even before way more life threatening deceases.
I usually find discussing with you enjoyable, but a discussion is not trying to get me to have a detailled plan so you can try to undermine every aspect of the plan. I think both the article of the 4 ICU doctors and the head of the ICU Amsterdam VUMC cover my arguments pretty well.
Scientifically provenYes I do.
Cause it's been scientifically proven lockdowns do not provide any extra effect on top of basic measures such as social distancing and working from home.
So now lockdowns dont work?
Scientifically proven
- Yet that's exactly what's worrying that IC boss in Amsterdam? And the other ICU doctors too. It's even used as an example.As I said before, but you ignored, no one goes to ICU for Covid to live a few extra months. That's just nonsense
So now lockdowns dont work?
Scientifically proven
But what do you think lockdowns are??? They are those measure, only enshrined into policy (because otherwise people just ignore the advice!)- And yes the studies so far (Stanford for example and a lot of source material I posted here too) indicate that a lockdown does not give any extra effect on top of the basic measures such as working from home, social distancing etc.
While I agree in theory some things could be open, a complex message/rules people don't do all that well. (Either by confusion or on purpose).Lockdowns work, but some of the rules in severe lockdowns are unnecessary.
Completely closing gyms, restaurants, stores, hair salons, etc. does absolutely nothing. All of them can remain open with restrictions.
Not letting people go outside......what? That’s North Korea stuff.
A lockdown to me is keeping people at home with curfews, max distance travel from their home, max visitors in your own home, closing shops, closing bars, closing restaurants.But what do you think lockdowns are??? They are those measure, only enshrined into policy (because otherwise people just ignore the advice!)
Unless all you are protesting for is a rebrand, I'm not sure of the point you are trying to make (again)