Not disagreeing - but can you expand on that one - not quite getting where you're coming from.
I agree with you rob
Not disagreeing - but can you expand on that one - not quite getting where you're coming from.
Not disagreeing - but can you expand on that one - not quite getting where you're coming from.
Why would you want to? It doesn't seem to contradict things we know through science, just gives a different perspective, which is why I think of it as a philosophy rather than a religion.
I agree with you rob
I have a lot of time for the concept of Budhism but applying it to reality and modern society is difficult. IMO, Utopian concepts are flawed amid the dysfunctional nature of humanity.
I would enjoy having a discussion with you all over this but not here.......over a drink someday as its too deep to explore and some of my meaning may be lost through translation. I do not want to offend anybody.
I have a lot of time for the concept of Budhism but applying it to reality and modern society is difficult. IMO, Utopian concepts are flawed amid the dysfunctional nature of humanity.
I would enjoy having a discussion with you all over this but not here.......over a drink someday as its too deep to explore and some of my meaning may be lost through translation. I do not want to offend anybody.
I have a lot of time for the concept of Budhism but applying it to reality and modern society is difficult. IMO, Utopian concepts are flawed amid the dysfunctional nature of humanity.
It's difficult. To get by from day to day and have dealings with other people, you can't really work in buddhism. (In buddhist thinking, for example, you can't really think of a book as a separate defined object; it's more the sum of everything that ever brought it about and allowed it to be. Everything is interlinked. There's not a definable 'you' or a definable 'I'.) However, if you encounter a problem and apply buddhist thinking to it, it can reduce the problem in the mind - from 'want' to thinking about major crisis, perhaps even death.
You have to remember when the Buddha lived, the world would have been a lot different. It's easier to understand and 'get' buddhism while walking in peace in the country or sitting in a quiet garden.
I would enjoy having a discussion with you all over this but not here.......over a drink someday as its too deep to explore and some of my meaning may be lost through translation. I do not want to offend anybody.
I have a lot of time for the concept of Budhism but applying it to reality and modern society is difficult. IMO, Utopian concepts are flawed amid the dysfunctional nature of humanity.
I think the principles can be applied still today.
Humanity is not naturally built to manage freedom, fame and indulgence. It distances a person from both nature itself and the natural order. The further you get from this the greater the emptiness that results. Given her personal disposition, maybe the best chance she'd have had of managing her ‘demons' would have been to withdraw from the life she knew, seek out decent and loving people and experience the value of making a contribution to the welfare of others in genuine need.
The buddhist view is that
(seemingly) no beliefs
Robder, that's why I say Buddhism works better in a natural setting.
We create, and have foisted upon us, many avoidable hassles during any given day. For example, I doubt the buddha ever had to deal with business meetings, train delays or being on cramped public transport with strangers.
One is trying to force buddhist thinking into a busy life - a challenge!
the kebab shop near us does Bhuddist kebabs, if you go in and ask for one he will make you one with everything!!