No no no. They claim the same heritage from Abraham and all that. But there was no Islamic religion until Mo. Just like there was no Christianity until Jesus.He wasn't the origin, so the yarn goes, merely the prophet. It's claimed that Islam was around long before that. The time of Abraham and Isaac and all that broohaha. Kinda similar in an extremely roundabout fashion to old/new testament
Knowing that is one of the benefits of growing up so close to Southall I guess
Win.
And we the people are foolishly taking the cheese.
/thread
No no no. They claim the same heritage from Abraham and all that. But there was no Islamic religion until Mo. Just like there was no Christianity until Jesus.
I'm going to be thick.
US government doing it to create division?
What is the alternative agenda?
The overwhelmingly negative nedia response is a fact though, not propoganda.
Not suggesting the media represents all of you crazy yank's opinions, however if the strategy is to provoke a reaction, then it has worked, and shame on those who reacted (sound like Oprah there).
Propaganda tactics. Use the overwhelmingly negative U.S. Media response as propaganda to paint our hatred against the religion of Islam and our hypocrisy of our beliefs thus painting us as the enemy of Islam to bolster support from moderates.
There may be some truth to that, but then again probably the same way that westerns are portrayed in the middle east/central Asia. It's not hate really, it's fear of the unknown and actions of a few making the impression on the rest of the world.
We both demonize each other though. Sometimes when I watch Al Jazerra I think wow, that's totally skewed but I'm sure the same is thought about western networks.
The proposed Imam is connected, he has to be to work the politics of this kind of situation, whether he's a face or appears moderate. The funding for this project alone takes some heavy weight with a major agenda, not to mention the complexities of building in NY.
Your're half right right. However, propaganda's definition tends to be misunderstood of being nonfactual or slander, but that is not correct. It can be factual, deceitful, blatant lies or whatever, as long as it is used to influence a group of people i.e. promotes the ideas and momentum of an agenda. Their goal was acheived and propaganda gained.
You are right though, like I said earlier, we took the cheese.
I got into a heated debate about this with my friend who accused me of being every name in the book. I said it's a legal right as long as it's on the up and up, there is nothing that can be done about it. Do I personally like the idea, hell no, but if the government intervenes then all that we stand for is for not. However, we do have the right to be pissed and voice our opinions so on the other hand, I don't see where some people get off saying we shouldn't say thing. Freedom of speech is protected in the very same first ammendement of our constitution along with religion, so the people are free to bitch as they like.
And I'm saying that as religions mature another 1000 years or so, they get less violent. You don't see people running around carrying out crusades or inquisitions now, do you?
Word.I said it's a legal right as long as it's on the up and up, there is nothing that can be done about it. Do I personally like the idea, hell no, but if the government intervenes then all that we stand for is for not.
My main problem is a lot of people doing the bitching most vocally seem to be the same Far Right nutjobs. And many of them seem to forget the fact that the rights to freedom of religion and freedom of assembly supersede anything else in this debate.However, we do have the right to be pissed and voice our opinions so on the other hand, I don't see where some people get off saying we shouldn't say anything. Freedom of speech is protected in the very same first ammendement of our constitution along with religion, so the people are free to bitch as they like.
More Madness from the Americans!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-11223457
Wonder how he would would feel if Muslims burn a stack of Bibles?
They're a bunch of radical Christian nutjobs... not too far away from the radical Islamic nutjobs they claim they're protesting against!