D djchewie Active Member May 19, 2009 #81 Morbyd said: I can only assume that the Sun's story was based on new DNA evidence? Click to expand... probably more like they couldnt be arsed to run with more stories of MPs with hands in rge xmas money tin, and thought this would be more of a laugh.
Morbyd said: I can only assume that the Sun's story was based on new DNA evidence? Click to expand... probably more like they couldnt be arsed to run with more stories of MPs with hands in rge xmas money tin, and thought this would be more of a laugh.
W weloveliam@space Active Member May 20, 2009 #82 N8 said: How come it is suddenly headline news today that it isn't his? That was found out and in the headlines a week after the first story? Click to expand... Morbyd said: I'm a little confused as well. I saw that story ages ago. I can only assume that the Sun's story was based on new DNA evidence? Click to expand... I think its been completely proven now, whereas the S*** headlines were an educated guess
N8 said: How come it is suddenly headline news today that it isn't his? That was found out and in the headlines a week after the first story? Click to expand... Morbyd said: I'm a little confused as well. I saw that story ages ago. I can only assume that the Sun's story was based on new DNA evidence? Click to expand... I think its been completely proven now, whereas the S*** headlines were an educated guess