The Footy... (2011-2012 season)

Really. They doubled down on it. Unbelievable the caliber of people who work there.

And it's your nation's top selling daily. Hang your heads in shame! :lol:


Honestly. No shame in losing to 2 goals like that. Absolute crackers.
The trajectory of that second goal defied certain laws of physics.


I think Joe Hart might be a bit busier on Sunday than he was on Monday night
 
When you sign a contract it is from the date you sign it and until whatever date both parties agree not 'rounded up' to the year.

:rolleyes:

When they state "4 year contract" they are clearly rounding to the nearest full year.

'they' = the media, press etc. not the FA!!! X_X

International football managerial contracts usually will run to the end of a tournament so 4 years would be to the end of Euro 2016 not December 2016.

Yes, that's right, just like I already said!!! :spank:

I think its safe to assume his contract will expire just after the 2016 Euros ie. 4 years & 2 months contract.

If the World Cup in Brazil is a failure they will only have 2 years to pay up if they decide to part ways. Still far far less than anything then anything they paid out for with Sven, Capello etc or whatever Harry and his entourage would have cost.

:spank:

Why risk having to pay out any kind of compensation?!?! Regardless of whether it be less than x, y or z. That money could be used far better elsewhere - like investing in our youth development system, which is in dire need of massive investment & stuck the dark ages in comparison to the likes of France & Spain.

Anyway what do you expect Hodgson to achieve in two years?

Win over his doubters, or prove them right. That'd be a good start. Yes, he's a good manager with a proven track record, and I personally believe he is the best (English)man for the job, just maybe not the right man for the job. But he does have a history of dropping the odd clanger. Paul Konchesky - need I say more?!

In 2 years years time we will be able to guage how successful he has been, taking all mitigating factors into account, hence:

Clearly the most sensible thing to have done would have been to given him a 2 year contract until after the World Cup in 2014, with the option of extending his tenure if all parties concerned are still happy.

Hodgson is not a short term appointment as I think that the Euros (2012) is not on the current agenda but building something longer term

Ok, fine. I agree. But long term option does not neccesarily need to equate to long term contract!!! Hodgson wanted the job, he would have taken it on the basis of 2 years with the option to extend. Any more and you are just making a rod for your back.

The squad is quite old and needs an overhaul from top to bottom after this tournament.

The squad isn't old. Generally, I think the squad is still very young and will improve with age. Yes, there are some of the old guard - Gerrard & Lamps for example - but you need some experience in their somewhere. Whether they all getting a starting place in the line-up is another debate entirely. Rooney is still only 26 himself. Cole has his place on merit alone. And Terry & Ferdinand - in all likeliness - will not feature after these finals.

Two year deal is not building for the future just begins another merry go round of managers.

This is the modern day I'm afraid. Long stints, particularly in International football, are a thing of the past - at least for the teams that deem themselves to be underachieving (again, another debate.)

Two year contract is a short term fix and would show the FA do not have trust or faith in him.

As mentioned previously, a clause in the contract with the option to extend the deal, or a "rolling contract" would eliminate this issue, and provide girth for both parties.

See how this tournament goes, and then start rebuilding in the wake of possibly have a team that could win the next Euros.

As a national team we should always build toward a World Cup, not the Euros. We are not Wales or Scotland.

The world cup in Brazil is a non-runner in terms of winning it.

Agreed. But we need to be even more realistic than that, we are decades away from being ready to compete and challenge for a major tournament. Our goal should be to reach the quarter finals, and be ectatic if we get as far as the semis.

The problem like everything in life is everyone wants everything straight away.

Football is a results business. That is truer in International football than it is club football. Can't whip out the chequebook to appease the fans with your country.
 
Interesting? Yes. Accurate? Hmmmm...

I would err not really. Article only looks from one dimension, and doesn't elaborate. Indeed, in the past Utd have spent excessive £££ on imports. But they have always had a good mix of their own homegrown talent.

Off the top of my head: the Nevilles, Butt, Scholes, Giggs, Wes Brown, John O'Shea, Darren Fletcher, Jonny Evans, Beckham, Welbeck, Cleverley, Pogba... I'm sure there are dozens more I can't remember from the past 20 years.

How many in City's current squad? Hart & Richards? Anymore?

Also, you have to look at the squad players SAF has signed and plucked from relative obscurity who have come good at a fraction of the transfer price. Ji Sung Park for example.

On the other end of the scale you have City, who spend millions on players just to stick them on the beach, or have them rot in the reserves: Benjani, Santa Cruz etc.

Add to this the frankly ridiculous money they have paid for distinctly average players: Barry £15m-ish, Lescott £25mil + (PMSL :lol:), Milner £25m. Yes, ALL good players, but not great players.

Taking all this into consideration, its a no contest. City have brought the title.
 
Interesting? Yes. Accurate? Hmmmm...
Off the top of my head: the Nevilles, Butt, Scholes, Giggs, Wes Brown, John O'Shea, Darren Fletcher, Jonny Evans, Beckham, Welbeck, Cleverley, Pogba... I'm sure there are dozens more I can't remember from the past 20 years.

How many in City's current squad? Hart & Richards? Anymore?


Add to this the frankly ridiculous money they have paid for distinctly average players: Barry £15m-ish, Lescott £25mil + (PMSL :lol:), Milner £25m. Yes, ALL good players, but not great players.

Taking all this into consideration, its a no contest. City have brought the title.

Lets be honest, most people know that City signed Joe Hart in 2006 from Shrewsbury.
Although the Academy was pretty busy producing the likes of (from 1999),SWP, Terry Dunfield, Chris Shuker, Dickson Etuhu, Leon Mike, Chris Killen, Tyrone Mears, Joey Barton, Stephen Jordan, Willo flood, Glenn Whelan, Stephen Elliott, BWP, Nedum Enouha, Jonathan D'laryea, Lee Croft, Stephen Ireland, Micah Richards, Ishmael Miller, Michael Johnson, Daniel Sturridge, Kasper Schmeichel, Kelvin Etuhu, Shaleum Logan, Ched Evans, Sam Williamson, Vladi Weiss, Dedryck Boyata, Abdi Ibrahim, Greg Cunningham, Alex Nimely, Jovan Vidal, Ben Mee, John Guidetti, Chris Chantler, Ryan Mcgivern, Reece Wabara to name a few.

I am also sure there are numerous teams in the PL that would be quite happy to have Lescott/Barry/Milner in their ranks
 
White Isle Calling - :spank::x:D8):eek::cry::p:confused: I can use them too you know action man.

2 years is not enough to build anything without waving a cheque book about. There are no cheque books in international football. If you get a club manager and they spend 100m on players then you expect them to be challenging but international management and football is different. Compensation for Hodgson is peanuts to wait is being out for Capello and Sven as previously stated which could have been spent on grass root football.

Look at Spain, how long did they have to wait before getting to the stage where they are? Look back at France too when they won they had to build prior to that over time. Hodgson. Hodgson does not have much time to build for this tournament but the country and media expects him to still be there or thereabouts and if they fail well it will all be his fault. With the players available I would expect to qualify from the group where possibly Spain or Italy await. Tough one that do you agree but in a one off match who knows. Our group is by no means a certainty either.

You say the squad is not old and quote Gerrard and Lamps. You forget Ferdinand, Terry, Cole, Parker, Barry, plus the likes of Crouch, Defoe, Lescott, Jagielka are in or not far off theirs 30s. We have plenty young players but are they international class? Only time will tell. Some of our current squad I do not think are international class but you work with the tools you have.

Do you see many world class or potentially world class players in the squad for the future? Hart yes maybe. Sturridge yes maybe? Kyle Walker yes maybe, Baines (decent enough)Walcott - nope, not for me, Welbeck? Smalling? Andy Carroll? Frazier Campbell? Ashley Young? Cahill? Adam Johnson (decent player), Can you see any of these setting 2014 world cup alight in Brazil?

This is probably the last tournament of the so called 'golden generation' so there could be a few changes building up to the next tournament. As I said I do not think their is any expectancy (from the FA) to win this or the next tournament but by 2016 (4 years) I would say the current crop of youngsters should be hiting their prime (Rooney will only 30 too) so I think that is aim of the FA hence the four year contract to be ready for them with a view to mounting a serious challenge.

As we both said Hodgson is the best Englishman for the job. Has a wealth of experience from around the world at both club and international level so given time may be able to set some sort of foundations for future generations for English football. Shame the media and rent a quote like Merse and Le Tiss have to spout their bollocks about it rather than getting behind him. Mind you who takes any notice of Merson?

Interesting piece from Patrick Barclay
'Five weeks ago, while criticising the Football Association's efforts to find a successor to Fabio Capello, I wrote in the context of Roy Hodgson: “I am not sure that the England managerial contest is any place for a serious candidate.”

It is a pleasure to take those words back and congratulate David Bernstein and Sir Trevor Brooking on their choice.

My only regret, having been advocating Hodgson as England manager since the last century, is that Bernstein and Brooking were not in positions of such influence in 2000, when the FA embarked on the foolish and horribly expensive policy of hiring foreigners who had made their reputations in the club game.

First came Sven-Goran Eriksson and, after the ill-starred tenure of Steve McClaren, they blundered on with Capello — even extending the Italian's £6 million-a-year contract before seeing how he would fare at the World Cup in South Africa.

How much was wasted over a decade in the breaking of a traditional principle observed by most of the leading football nations such as Germany, Italy and Brazil?

A rough calculation, made by adding up the inflated salaries of Eriksson, Capello and a host of mainly compatriot assistants and subtracting the job's true value — of their English predecessors, only Kevin Keegan received more than £500,000 — is that £40million gushed out of the English game for no good reason.

Had it instead been poured into the project now known as St George's Park, the national football centre would have been up and running for years, not still awaiting its inaugural ceremony.

So the FA have engaged Hodgson a decade late and can hardly expect to get him for £500,000 now.

But should Bernstein and Brooking have acted sooner, indeed on the February day when Capello drove away from Wembley?

Of course they should: covertly. Maybe they did. At any rate, West Brom's season was not disrupted by speculation. Tottenham's was.

And we can blame the FA for that only to the extent that they appear to have misled the media by portraying themselves as muddled.

Now they seem ready to appoint an excellent candidate.

Hodgson mastered international football when with Switzerland in the 1990s and only amnesia can prevent him from succeeding with his own country.

That and the corrosive effect of the critics if it reaches the public and players: at Liverpool he was blamed for not being Kenny Dalglish and there is a risk that he will seen as the anti-Harry now.

Bernstein and Brooking are right to take it. They have favoured substance over perception and that, for the FA, is real progress'
 


Lets be honest, most people know that City signed Joe Hart in 2006 from Shrewsbury.
Although the Academy was pretty busy producing the likes of (from 1999),SWP, Terry Dunfield, Chris Shuker, Dickson Etuhu, Leon Mike, Chris Killen, Tyrone Mears, Joey Barton, Stephen Jordan, Willo flood, Glenn Whelan, Stephen Elliott, BWP, Nedum Enouha, Jonathan D'laryea, Lee Croft, Stephen Ireland, Micah Richards, Ishmael Miller, Michael Johnson, Daniel Sturridge, Kasper Schmeichel, Kelvin Etuhu, Shaleum Logan, Ched Evans, Sam Williamson, Vladi Weiss, Dedryck Boyata, Abdi Ibrahim, Greg Cunningham, Alex Nimely, Jovan Vidal, Ben Mee, John Guidetti, Chris Chantler, Ryan Mcgivern, Reece Wabara to name a few.

I am also sure there are numerous teams in the PL that would be quite happy to have Lescott/Barry/Milner in their ranks

All you have done there is list names that have come from City's youth academy. And yes, there are some prominent names. But for your argument to work you can only include players who have been involved in the squad in a title challenging season. So that would be... Richard (& Hart - yes, I had forgotten he was brought from the lower league's, but I'd still include him as he was nurtured at City) Point is, you can list youth products from ANY team, but unless it supports your argument, its invalid.

Have Milner, Barry & Lescott in your squad? Yes. Pay THAT much money for their services? Nope. Not a chance. You're smoking crack (or a gazillionaire Oligarch

:lol:
 
from ANY team, but unless it supports your argument, its invalid.


:lol:


No you are 100% correct, Beckham has had a great season with UTD this year, same with Butt, Brown and O'Shea

You made reference to who UTD had produced over the past '20 years' not ones that had influenced this season's outcome

crack pipe passed straight back to you mate

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No you are 100% correct, Beckham has had a great season with UTD this year, same with Butt, Brown and O'Shea

You made reference to who UTD had produced over the past '20 years' not ones that had influenced this season's outcome

crack pipe passed straight back to you mate

:rolleyes:

No, not THIS season. But a previous title winning season, yes, they were.

This season is the only season in recent memory I can recall City challenging for the title, is it not? Correct me if I'm wrong.

The article you referenced implied that every winner of the Premier League since its inception had brought the title.

Whilst I believe that to have an element of truth, I believe it is lazy, subjective journalism (most likely written by a fan) because it negates other contributing factors.

Of course Utd (and Chelsea, and Arsenal) have made big name signings - but that doesn't guarentee you success.

Hell, I willing to put money on the fact our three promoted teams from the Championship will spend more in transfer fees in the off-season this summer than the likes of Everton & West Brom - does that guarentee they will finish above them? Of course not.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If any Man City fan thinks their success is in any way, shape, or form due to anything other than a sudden and vulgar influx of money, then they're as deluded as John Terry's wife.

Just accept they're the team you love and you enjoy the good years because you've suffered through the ****e ones...Most of you have on here and you'll get credit for it, just don't reel off a list of names and embarass yourself by suggesting Jonathan Dairylea is a key element of your squad and is the next striker "never to play for you again" :lol:
 
The instant nature of today's fans be it national or club teams, put pressure for win now. Most club spend money in the transfer window to either maintain their spot in the table or to go higher. The development of youth takes a back seat because to winning now. All teams spend money and nab players from other teams youth academy's.

The England national team needs a long term fix a manager hired for a 6 year term to develop players without the pressure of winning now. The stalwarts of past English side are getting old and don't have the pace to contend any longer(Terry, scholes, Giggs, etc.... The English side will not win the Euro's this year, so why not go young to build international experience? What will happen is the search for fools gold with old squad and a disappointing result. Look at other euro squads who put the the elder statements out to pasture (Germany, Holland, France) or the sides that din't England and Italy) Just my 2 cents from an outside point of view.
 
White Isle Calling - :spank::x:D8):eek::cry::p:confused: I can use them too you know action man.

2 years is not enough to build anything without waving a cheque book about. There are no cheque books in international football. If you get a club manager and they spend 100m on players then you expect them to be challenging but international management and football is different. Compensation for Hodgson is peanuts to wait is being out for Capello and Sven as previously stated which could have been spent on grass root football.

Look at Spain, how long did they have to wait before getting to the stage where they are? Look back at France too when they won they had to build prior to that over time. Hodgson. Hodgson does not have much time to build for this tournament but the country and media expects him to still be there or thereabouts and if they fail well it will all be his fault. With the players available I would expect to qualify from the group where possibly Spain or Italy await. Tough one that do you agree but in a one off match who knows. Our group is by no means a certainty either.

You say the squad is not old and quote Gerrard and Lamps. You forget Ferdinand, Terry, Cole, Parker, Barry, plus the likes of Crouch, Defoe, Lescott, Jagielka are in or not far off theirs 30s. We have plenty young players but are they international class? Only time will tell. Some of our current squad I do not think are international class but you work with the tools you have.

Do you see many world class or potentially world class players in the squad for the future? Hart yes maybe. Sturridge yes maybe? Kyle Walker yes maybe, Baines (decent enough)Walcott - nope, not for me, Welbeck? Smalling? Andy Carroll? Frazier Campbell? Ashley Young? Cahill? Adam Johnson (decent player), Can you see any of these setting 2014 world cup alight in Brazil?

This is probably the last tournament of the so called 'golden generation' so there could be a few changes building up to the next tournament. As I said I do not think their is any expectancy (from the FA) to win this or the next tournament but by 2016 (4 years) I would say the current crop of youngsters should be hiting their prime (Rooney will only 30 too) so I think that is aim of the FA hence the four year contract to be ready for them with a view to mounting a serious challenge.

As we both said Hodgson is the best Englishman for the job. Has a wealth of experience from around the world at both club and international level so given time may be able to set some sort of foundations for future generations for English football. Shame the media and rent a quote like Merse and Le Tiss have to spout their bollocks about it rather than getting behind him. Mind you who takes any notice of Merson?

Ok, so what if...

We are knocked out of the Euros at the group stage without registering a single goal, get thrashed by the French, the squad is full of in-fighting and he loses control, then we fail to qualify for the 2014 World Cup, oh, and he selects Paul Konchesky - :lol: (hypothetical, I'm fully aware, but let just say that happens)...

are you honestly telling me you would continue to support him as manager and willing to give him another major tournament????

If the answer is yes, then congratulations, you are a better, more forgiving, more optimistic man than me.

I am not saying we should axe him after 2 years... and yes, if we do poorly at the Euros, and struggle in the WC qualifiers but still progress, so long as there are signs of promise I'd be all for sticking with him, but anything more than 2 years is just plain crazy. By all means, if he shows promise then extend his deal, let's not presume he will do any better than Sven, McClaren, Capello.

The 'Golden Generation' is a myth of epic proportions, created by our media. The best player our country produced in this so-called golden generation was Paul Scholes by a country mile, and look at how he was shat on by a succession of managers - played out of position on the left, while the under-performing Gerrard & Lampard took centre stage. No wonder he quit international football so early, it was a disgrace how he was treated.

I did actually mention Ferdinand & Terry (from the previous post the excessive:spank: emoticons were used as you clearly hadn't read my last post properly!!!) I believe there is a high possibility that neither will make the plane to Ukraine, I may even argue that they definitely shouldn't. Ferdinand on fitness & performance, does not deserve to go. Terry on attitude and public image does not deserve to go.

At the same time, I can also think of countless arguments as to why you must take at least one, if not both. Both great leaders. Ferdinand will rouse the dressing room, support the younger player. Terry is great on-field leader and will come good in the big games. But if they can't co-exist the squad could potentially be torn in two, so including them both is tantamount to suicide. Then again, who do you leave behind? Choices, choices. Roy has a hard job on his hands just in terms of selection, and he won't please everybody.

All those players you list - all of them are international level... just very few of them are world class. But we just have to accept this. It's about time we realised we are just not as good as we would like to think we are. I predict Hart & Welbeck will definitely be as good as Seaman & Owen for England, will that be enough - I doubt it. Of the others you mention, pfft, they need to show a lot of improvement.

And I agree, Walcott is shoite, and Capello was right to exclude him from South Africa.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If any Man City fan thinks their success is in any way, shape, or form due to anything other than a sudden and vulgar influx of money, then they're as deluded as John Terry's wife.

Just accept they're the team you love and you enjoy the good years because you've suffered through the ****e ones...Most of you have on here and you'll get credit for it, just don't reel off a list of names and embarass yourself by suggesting Jonathan Dairylea is a key element of your squad and is the next striker "never to play for you again" :lol:

Who said they were a key elements to this season?

The comment was made following the comment about home grown talent etc

Its only in later comments that its reverted to players being relevant to this season

If you read the MEN article which started this conversation (which I am sure you have) it stated that city had £300m on the pitch Utd £250m with a £30m striker on the bench

That is all :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top