weloveliam@space
Active Member
I was going to ask
"Would you", but thought it would be in bad taste.
Not after Mr brand
I was going to ask
"Would you", but thought it would be in bad taste.
So the outcome is Brand resigns and will make a fortune from the noteriety (good on him!), this isn't the first or probably the last time he'll get into trouble for taking a joke a little too far, Ross looses a few weeks pay but keeps his job (glad about that too), there's still no mention of the senior producer who allowed this to get broadcast on air (???) and the controller of Radio 2 quits her job (very foolish), oh and over 30,000 people who never even heard the original broadcast jump on the band wagon to complain to the bbc (oh how good it feels to be British) and the stupid cow who decided to sleep with Russell Brand will now find fame and fortune..wait for her cover story in heat magazine...despite her obvious intentions for making this a big deal, she was probably the one who originally called the Daily Mail....ridiculous!
Big question for me is....
WHEN DO WE PROTEST MARCH?
Basically - Ross and Brand ARE at fault because they've gone public and outed her as a slut on live radio...and told her entire family about her private life at the same time. That's not nice at all...and they deserve to be suspended (but not fired).
In the mean time, she should be allowed to continue to do what she loves.
When Dispatchers played the interview Brand did with Jimmy Saville for the radio was creepy and so blatantly obvious what Saville was like.It's always the people you most expect, isn't it?
Made the BBC an easy target. It gave lots of people (other media) the opportunity to attack 'an institution'
They don't let opportunities like that slip away.
Having said that - Brand is a gigantic c*nt of epic proportions.
Frightening how many of them are amongst us.Predictable 'the MSM want to silence him' turnout from the tin-foilers