kimajy
Well-Known Member
Not to piss on the parade but it is slightly concerning that early tests show that the Oxford vaccine offers minimal protection to the South African mutation - this is why mutations are so important and explains why the government are reacting so urgently to try and pin down any outbreaks of it.
In the long term, it shouldn't prove too much of an issue as they are already working on tweaking the vaccine and there's every chance it will end up being a yearly booster with a unique formula each year relevant to any mutations, but that this particular mutation has enabled the virus to mask itself is worrying in terms of supressing the spread of the virus in the immediate future.
Tying in to the general issue that high prevalence creates the conditions in which mutations happen so the higher the prevalence (symptomatic or not) the more likely it is something happens to send us all back round this loop. This is one of the reasons I'm so intolerant of people banging drums about opening stuff up again before that prevalence is driven right down and most people vaccinated. It's a bit like popping a pin in a tyre before you go out for a drive !
Hate to say it but it may make more sense to leave borders closed this Summer even if prevalence is down. Looking at how NZ and Aus are pretty much enjoying full normal lives right now, it's a trade-off I might even be willing to make for a year.