What's the joke?
What's the joke?
That’s what I don’t get! That’s why people question if there is something behind this. Surly they would be doing everything possible to manipulate the numbers down so they don’t get absolutely slaughtered!Can someone explain is? Again genuine question......
I had virus November. And had I f@cked up a deep dive 1 month after. I would have gone down as a covid statistic. When infact it would have been the dive profile which would have been the problem....
Even you do it Stivi. Twist and mock my words instead of discussing the content of the post.I also don't get how 100k deaths can make anyone laugh
They are more likely to push the numbers up to keep the people abiding the rules.That’s what I don’t get! That’s why people question if there is something behind this. Surly they would be doing everything possible to manipulate the numbers down so they don’t get absolutely slaughtered!
Can’t really argue with ONS excess death statistics though. Ever thought that the experts do actually know a thing or two? There is no benefits to a goverment to keeping people from spending their money.They are more likely to push the numbers up to keep the people abiding the rules.
It was a really really poor way of saying it mate.Even you do it Stivi. Twist and mock my words instead of discussing the content of the post.
Anyway, I laughed at HOW and WHAT they count as Covid deaths. No one here is laughing about 100k deaths.
Like I say - how many people do you think have died and caught covid within 28 days to 'push the numbers up' ?They are more likely to push the numbers up to keep the people abiding the rules.
Yeah but that's what they want you to thinkUK deaths are up 20% on the previous year. I think that’s enough evidence.
Like I say - how many people do you think have died and caught covid within 28 days to 'push the numbers up' ?
How else do you think they should count it ?
Or as posted above how about measuring this as 'excess deaths' ? Or will you find some issue with that?
You're very good at actually not answering questions put to you.Allright poor choice of words it was then.
It's about playing with statistics. You can prove either point with it if you use it like this.
Also we've debated about the trustability of PCR tests earlier too. Those count too.
I'm not saying 10k would make a huge difference in how we should look at this virus...but what if it's more? What if it's 20k?
How about worldwide.
Another angle.....let's say we would test everyone that dies on Herpes.
And use the same rhetoric they use now for Covid. Herpes would be the most deadly virus in the world.
Allright poor choice of words it was then.
It's about playing with statistics. You can prove either point with it if you use it like this.
Also we've debated about the trustability of PCR tests earlier too. Those count too.
I'm not saying 10k would make a huge difference in how we should look at this virus...but what if it's more? What if it's 20k?
How about worldwide.
Another angle.....let's say we would test everyone that dies on Herpes.
And use the same rhetoric they use now for Covid. Herpes would be the most deadly virus in the world.
I'm not here to answer all your questions.You're very good at actually not answering questions put to you.
Again:
1) In your 'expert' opinion, how many people do you think are incorrectly being added to the number of 100k?
2) How would you count the deaths? Using what criteria and how would you calculate that number?
3) If this really was some 'fear porn' thing - why would they add an asterisk and comments on it? Hardly hiding the fact are they
Not debating people dying from Covid. I know.Except people are dying of coronavirus and not of herpes? You are off on an odd tangent today
New virus emerges. Same time millions of extra deaths occur around the globe. Millions die with symptoms of Covid. Not sure what you are getting at.