What can we all learn from the teenage pregnancy scandal?

Buckley said:
I typed it really, really slow this time. Any easier to understand? :lol:

I understood it the first time thank you. Your posts always give me the impression that you believe you are more intelligent that the rest of the forum members.

Surely there's no need to be so pedantic all the time.
 
stuie said:
Buckley said:
I typed it really, really slow this time. Any easier to understand? :lol:

I understood it the first time thank you. Your posts always give me the impression that you believe you are more intelligent that the rest of the forum members.
Surely there's no need to be so pedantic all the time.

Stuie - I'm a little upset by that. I made a point of pointing out that I was making a stupid joke, not belittling someone for typing quickly on a message board.

For the record, I'm sure there are people far more intelligent than here on me and I don't believe the above.
 
Buckley said:
Stuie - I'm a little upset by that. I made a point of pointing out that I was making a stupid joke, not belittling someone for typing quickly on a message board.

I'm not going to get involved in a slanging match with you Buckley, that's just the impression I get reading your posts. Forget i said anything.
 
stuie said:
Buckley said:
Stuie - I'm a little upset by that. I made a point of pointing out that I was making a stupid joke, not belittling someone for typing quickly on a message board.

I'm not going to get involved in a slanging match with you Buckley, that's just the impression I get reading your posts. Forget i said anything.

As I've said in a PM I've just sent you - this doesn't make any sense. If it did I'd apologise because I meant no harm. However, I can't because an objective observer would struggle to find anything even inadvertently malicious in that post.
 
stuie wrote:
Buckley wrote:
Stuie - I'm a little upset by that. I made a point of pointing out that I was making a stupid joke, not belittling someone for typing quickly on a message board.


I'm not going to get involved in a slanging match with you Buckley, that's just the impression I get reading your posts. Forget i said anything.


As I've said in a PM I've just sent you - this doesn't make any sense. If it did I'd apologise because I meant no harm. However, I can't because an objective observer would struggle to find anything even inadvertently malicious in that post.

I'm a newbie so can I be your Independent adjudicator?..... You're succesfully winding each other up (which is amusing to me - I have to be honest) when there was nothing malicious to start with - Kiss and make friends.....

Now will either of you support me in my quest to make Scoobie PM....??

I'll remain unbiased always :lol:
 
DJNC said:
I'm a newbie so can I be your Independent adjudicator?..... You're succesfully winding each other up (which is amusing to me - I have to be honest) when there was nothing malicious to start with - Kiss and make friends.....

Now will either of you support me in my quest to make Scoobie PM....??

I'll remain unbiased always :lol:

This man talks a lot of sense. I'd listen to him if I were you :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
N8 said:
"reoriented welfare on two explicit goals: marriage, and reducing births outside wedlock"

So he's basically trying to tell people how to live their own lives? What has marriage got to do with anything? Just because you're not married, doesn't make you any worse of a parent.
 
This man talks a lot of sense. I'd listen to him if I were you

Thanks :!:
No-One has ever said that about me before :lol: :lol:

I'm touched :oops:

Scoobie for PM!! Scoobie for PM.... etc etc....
 
DJNC said:
stuie wrote:
Buckley wrote:
Stuie - I'm a little upset by that. I made a point of pointing out that I was making a stupid joke, not belittling someone for typing quickly on a message board.


I'm not going to get involved in a slanging match with you Buckley, that's just the impression I get reading your posts. Forget i said anything.


As I've said in a PM I've just sent you - this doesn't make any sense. If it did I'd apologise because I meant no harm. However, I can't because an objective observer would struggle to find anything even inadvertently malicious in that post.

I'm a newbie so can I be your Independent adjudicator?..... You're succesfully winding each other up (which is amusing to me - I have to be honest) when there was nothing malicious to start with - Kiss and make friends.....

Now will either of you support me in my quest to make Scoobie PM....??

I'll remain unbiased always :lol:

Like ACAS, DJNC, you have four letters in your name. If your name is, like ACAS, an acronym, having never seen you simultaneously, I will began to suspect that you are, in fact, one and the same concilliation service.

I think we should be told.
 
stuie said:
Buckley said:
As I've said in a PM I've just sent you

I've replied, but you don't need to type your reply slowly for me to understand!

I refer the honourable gentleman to the 'disclaimer' post directly underneath my typing slowly post.
 
Like ACAS, DJNC, you have four letters in your name. If your name is, like ACAS, an acronym, having never seen you simultaneously, I will began to suspect that you are, in fact, one and the same concilliation service.

I think we should be told.

I have to come clean with you, you are correct, both do have 4 letters. (theres so many jokes in that one sentence based on your previous posts, I daren't even mention how much intelligence is required to work out how many letters are required..he he sorry - I said I would be independant!)

Ahem.... Anyway, Unfortunately that is where the similarities end....
I have to be honest - I had to step in as I could not bear to see you and Stuie (hope I've spelt that right :oops: ) falling out over three unfortunate 'UGLY' girls... (Still with Ya Scoobie!!)

When you put it in perspective and 'step away' from the conversation you see just how amusing it was. (Poor Silv dropped out ages ago when everyone started making light of the poor situation these 3 scroungers (I mean) little darlings are in.... Funny to watch you guys carry on :lol: :lol:

So thankyou for cheering up my dull Wednesday with 16 weeks to go.....

I'm with Scoobie (in the Metaphoric sense) The topic is sad, but there's a punch line there....started by x-amount - remember the first post....

Like a true politician / ACAS memeber I hope I've avoided answering suitably :lol: :lol:

P.S. Sorry about the spelling I didn't go to skool
 
Crikey, I turn my back for an extended lunch and anarchy!

silvia said:
Buckley, do you have the vital need to make joke of EVERYTHING including serious debates? :roll:

Haha, in the words of the hysterical woman in the Ali G bit "You may take our trees, but you will never take... our freedom"

This is serious you w4nker!

Buckley said:
For the record, I'm sure there are people far more intelligent than here on me

Hahahahahahahahaha
 
x-amount said:
Crikey, I turn my back for an extended lunch and anarchy!

silvia said:
Buckley, do you have the vital need to make joke of EVERYTHING including serious debates? :roll:

Haha, in the words of the hysterical woman in the Ali G bit "You may take our trees, but you will never take... our freedom"

This is serious you w4nker!

Buckley said:
For the record, I'm sure there are people far more intelligent than here on me

Hahahahahahahahaha


HAHAHAHA,CLASSIC! :D
 
x-amount said:
Crikey, I turn my back for an extended lunch and anarchy!

silvia said:
Buckley, do you have the vital need to make joke of EVERYTHING including serious debates? :roll:

Haha, in the words of the hysterical woman in the Ali G bit "You may take our trees, but you will never take... our freedom"


Can anyone explain it to me, please?
 
Back
Top