Given that too much debt was the problem, how is 'stimulus' (i.e. more debt) also the solution?
Serious question - I hear this argument all the time and I genuinely don't understand it.
If you stimulate the private sector with capital projects, ie infrastructure, regeneration, housing, the theory is that typically this will lead to growth, innovation and employment within the private sector which will in turn lead to more money spent in the economy and more tax revenues etc.
A study was recently undertaken on a £100m infrastructure project which is expected to generate a return of £4 for every £1 spent, in terms of attracting business to the region as the improved infrastructure will attract private sector investment, employment opportunites and further regeneration.
If the goverment spend money
wisely, they can stimulate growth. It's not about chucking money at a problem or subsidising false growth by more debt.
Alos, there are many billions of pounds held within the private sector which businesses are holding onto as a safety net, which would otherwise be spent on hiring, expansion etc.
The private sector could unleash this spending power if signals of confidence were forthcoming. In the meantime, what would previously have been a war chest for growth is held onto as a comfort blanket in case times get tougher.