Donald Trump....
- Thread starter MiniMarc
- Start date
- Status
Moha
Well-Known Member
Remember apartheid?
What was the Land Act during apartheid in South Africa?
The Act became law on 19 June 1913 limiting African land ownership to 7 percent and later 13 percent through the 1936 Native Trust and Land Act of South Africa. The Act restricted black people from buying or occupying land except as employees of a white master.
Namaste
Active Member
I doubt, that Trump has any clue about South African politics, history and ethnics.
This law is not only against white people, it is against wasteland in general. Unused land can be taken by the general public and be used as farmland. This land it is not taken away from the former owner for free, they are to receive a monetary compensation in the amount of the lands value.
For example, the church as such owns quite a sufficient amount of unused South African farmland, which could be given to white and black farmers. The royal Zulu familiy owns about 1/3rd of Kwazulu-Nataal parts of which are in question and I doubt they are white.
So, if you praise Donald Trump, you should be careful not to look as stupid as he does.
Snowy
Active Member
This is a law to be used by those in power against these not in power. White farmers and land owners will be screwed. The Zulus might also find themselves on the losing side, all depending on the shifting alliances and power struggles. But that will result in the breaking up of South Africa. I think this will be for the best. Western Cape should also GTFO at the first and best opportunity.
Johnny Vodka
Well-Known Member
Some kind of irony in Trump standing up for women's rights (a) considering his stance on reproductive rights and (b) considering some of the things he's said and also been found guilty of. Maybe looks good in a day when you've just announced support for ethnic cleansing too..
tclubber
Active Member
Since 44% of women who voted chose Trump, it appears reproductive and other rights are not that important to U. S. women.
What is his stance on reproductive rights?
Johnny Vodka
Well-Known Member
It's fair to say they won't be safe in his hands.
Trump capped his first week by signing orders targeting reproductive care
At the March for Life rally, the president said he was ‘proud to be a participant’ in the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade in 2022
www.independent.co.uk
I’d say it’s safe. He’s already said he has no plans of changing it from the states. That article is clickbait and those executive orders are just a continuation of bringing everything to the states.It's fair to say they won't be safe in his hands.
Trump capped his first week by signing orders targeting reproductive care
At the March for Life rally, the president said he was ‘proud to be a participant’ in the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade in 2022
BareBen91
Active Member
Horses can no longer compete against men or women, with the exception of archery.
matter
Active Member
MrHullMysterious
Well-Known Member
He is doing what he said. *they* are doing what they said they would:
Interesting watch. Made 2 months before inauguration.
Wonder how much bio diesel i would make.
Interesting watch. Made 2 months before inauguration.
Wonder how much bio diesel i would make.
The Sun God
Well-Known Member
interesting how the whoppers in the gossip thread who called me insufferable largely overlap with the Nazi sympathisers on this thread...
safety in numbers eh, ladz...
safety in numbers eh, ladz...
Last edited:
mashednlovingit
Well-Known Member
You made your apology yet lad?
Nah just more unprovoked attacks calling people Nazis. Par for the course.
- Status