Buckley
Well-Known Member
OllieW said:Seeing as the bible itself is no more than a collection of folk tales that has been interpreted, reinterpreted and edited for omissions and inclusions in many forms for nearly a couple of thousand years it seems unbelievable that anyone would put so much faith in another book that is based very loosely on what amounts to quite a small portion of it.
But surely that would suggest that having ultimate faith in the source text would be as unfounded as believing as fact the secondary one?