The Last Tommy

Morbyd said:
It's a little more complicated, but it's actually got more to do with the balance of the "great powers".

The strongest countries at the time (Britain & France on one side, Germany, Austria-Hungary on the other, Russia wavering as usual but mainly with the UK-French axis) had a 5-nation balance of power thing going. Once war broke out, which threatened this balance, it was only a matter of time before everyone got pulled into it (the Russians had to pull out, of course, because of that little revolution). The Russians especially didn't like their little ethnic cousins, the Serbs, getting pounced on.

I also studied poli-sci in uni :D

Your explanation is the structure mine is the substructure. This whole balance, axis of power was based on the discourse that controlling the motherland and the seas meant controlling the world. Or to be more precise, having someone else control it could be dangerous!

I always look for the simple answer Morbyd, sometimes it's the hardest to find!

Did Pol Sci too but much prefered Pol Geo as it delved more into the why rather than the what.

Anyway, I think we have forgotten about one of the main wars in our time.

Star Wars.
 
i think we're too quick to snub our old folk...

I'd be a cantancorous old git (shut it :lol: ) if i went through what they had to. They sites they saw, the acts they had to commit, the lack of care and support when they came home. And most just got on with it... Makes you feel ashamed!
 
Dencer said:
I believe the real reason it all started was because a bloke call Archie Duke shot an Osterich

An interesting point.

But was it not a Bantha that got shot by Ecky Dallas?
 
jeembo said:
Your explanation is the structure mine is the substructure. This whole balance, axis of power was based on the discourse that controlling the motherland and the seas meant controlling the world. Or to be more precise, having someone else control it could be dangerous!

I always look for the simple answer Morbyd, sometimes it's the hardest to find!

Did Pol Sci too but much prefered Pol Geo as it delved more into the why rather than the what.
We studied a lot more "why" than "what". "What" is the realm of people who study history, not political science.

The control of the seas was an issue for the previous century. By the beginning of the 20th century, there was more a desire to make sure that other people didn't get too powerful, than a concentration on controlling more. Countries had their colonies and outposts by then, mostly. Boundaries in Europe were drawn. You just wanted to make sure you could keep what you had, thus the alliances designed to balance things out.
 
Back
Top