Salute your 2006 World Cup Champions

Rickaroo said:
jeembo said:
According to Darwins theory of evolution we are all of African roots.

Next ...


Are you another one of Buckey's many aliases?


Many profiles....same message.

No, not another Buckley. Prob the same message because it's the truth?

Anywa, Brazil aren't that good, they've still to win the European Championship!
 
Conrado said:
NITEFLY said:
Rickaroo said:
chewie_oo7 said:
then how come an african team has never lifted the world cup.


Bad governments and not adequate nutrition.


Happy now?!

:lol:

No, it never stopped the Brazilian team...


Brazil is run by superior intellectuals of Spanish descent....not african. Hence, the difference in government and the ability to provide food for the masses.
 
Rickaroo said:
Conrado said:
NITEFLY said:
Rickaroo said:
chewie_oo7 said:
then how come an african team has never lifted the world cup.


Bad governments and not adequate nutrition.


Happy now?!

:lol:

No, it never stopped the Brazilian team...


Brazil is run by superior intellectuals of Spanish descent....not african. Hence, the difference in government and the ability to provide food for the masses.

Portuguese. Superior? are you sure?
 
Rickaroo said:
Moha said:
Portuguese. Superior? are you sure?


Yep, I'm sure.

I'm with Rick on this one ;)

Mourinho.tieude.jpg
 
rick, yr talking utter bollocks again.

if u wanna start world war 3 and set people against one another,m id suggest you run for president.
 
Let's stick to the correct parameters (sorry about spellin)

Name 5 players who have represented an African nation at Football.

I'll give you 5 even better players who haven't played for and African nation.

Historically and presently, non-African players are better at football.

I rest my case.

George Weah was absolutely amazing!!!
 
Morbyd said:
Fifa rankings as of Oct 2005

1 Brazil
2 Netherlands
3 Czech Republic
4 Argentina
5 France
6 Mexico
7 USA
8 Spain
9 England
9 Portugal

:P

the other day after seeing this top 10 somewhere else, i finally decided to investigate why USA/Mexico are continually in the world top 10 despite being about as good as glen johnson.

so basically, despite FIFA categorising weightings on the basis of regional strength, the weighting difference is so small that it means the better countries in weak regions will amass loads of points by winning most games (like USA/Mexico) but their position won't be significantly handicapped by the weighting. As follows

UEFA x 1.00
CONMEBOL x 0.99
CAF x 0.96
CONCACAF x 0.94
AFC x 0.93
OFC x 0.93

So, playing the Solomon Islands is only a 0.07 weighting difference compared to anyone in europe (yep even luxembourg). b*llocks FIFA, b*llocks!!

likewise, USA/mexico playin panama, st.kitts and nevis or any other carribean island with a name, b*llocks FIFA, absolute b*llocks.

i mean i know there are some bad types in europe but USA in world top 10 - :lol: :lol: :lol: gimme a break!!
 
Rickaroo said:
Portuguese....Spanish....what's the difference...we're all descendants of Adam and Eve anyway.

rickaroo........didgeridoo........what's the difference.........they're both wooden and get blown on by native australian men ;) ;)
 
Back
Top