Mixmag survey, Discuss
- Thread starter Robder
- Start date
puppylover
Active Member
Mr PL would be devastated if that were the truth for his missus!! and vice versa I might add!!! 
gingerfreak
New Member
Per decade is about right at the mo. 
gingerfreak
New Member
Yeah, could have said "You have an average of 0-60 sexual partners per year." That's as useful.
N
N8
Guest
Mixmag = shit end of.
I know!!! I can't bring myself to buy it any more cos it's more like a copy of FHM or Nuts with some added club listings...I just tend to peruse it in Smiths during my lunch break.
*nostalgic moment* I remember back in the day, it was almost as thick as the yello pages but nowadays it's about 5 pages long. What's that all about???
Anyway, we're going off the plot (again 
)
*nostalgic moment* I remember back in the day, it was almost as thick as the yello pages but nowadays it's about 5 pages long. What's that all about???
Anyway, we're going off the plot (again
)
S
*Saffy*
Guest
I've had less than that in my whole bloomin life ! 
mixmag = shite, I do concur ! apart from the odd CD which is probably why most of us buy it. Shock horror - another survey about what we do, who we do it with, how old we were when we first did it, with whom and how old they were and how long it took (on average). You get the point ! iDJ and DJ p*ss all over it IMO.
FranticDrive
New Member
I didn't agree with all the '50 worst songs ever' list either. Some of them were cheesy, granted, but still classics. Although Castles in the Sky at #1 was justified. And anything else Ian Van Dahl has done is equally bad.
Some of the 'averages' of the drug survey were pretty vague too. If you do stats (who am i kidding?) you'll know that averages (means) don't count for a hell of alot unless theyre tested for significance. You could get an outlier (e.g 'i did 3 grams to myself once) which brings the average way up.
Sorry for nerdy stats crap, but if there's one useful thing i've leaned is- never trust a percentage. That's why Government figures are always bullshit.
Some of the 'averages' of the drug survey were pretty vague too. If you do stats (who am i kidding?) you'll know that averages (means) don't count for a hell of alot unless theyre tested for significance. You could get an outlier (e.g 'i did 3 grams to myself once) which brings the average way up.
Sorry for nerdy stats crap, but if there's one useful thing i've leaned is- never trust a percentage. That's why Government figures are always bullshit.