DJM600 or Xone62

[Stu Hirst]

Filter amd flange man myself, I must admit. Oh err

you've got to explore the other equipment than just the flange !!!

I'll get my coat.....

 

[BBS]

Theres nothing like a bit of flange........must resist.....anymore jokes...

 

[Aundee]

bbs - and don't forget the stevie wonder head movement you do when you hit those affects


so the djm600 is in the lead at the moment. thanks guys

 

[nish]

Ive heard that Xone's sound better on bigger systems/set ups

 

[Aundee]

The Cross has the xone62s. They look and sound the business.
But do i need a mixer like that for home use?
I like the effects on the djm600

 

[nish]

home use GET the pdjm600!

I dont even dj but thats the one ive wanted since before it even came out!

Ive heard lots of djs talk big it up as well

 

[BARTONIOUS]

Allen & Heath Xone62 has better build quality and has better sound quality than the Pioneer DJM600. Also has 6 channels which is more than the Pioneer. Ideal for club use although maybe not worth buying for home use as you won't get the full benefit from it.

Better getting the Allen & Heath Xone32 if it's for home use. 3 channels, same great build quality and sound quality as the Xone62 and it's cheaper than the Pioneer DJM600. Nice filter it has too. The Pioneer has more effects but they're perhaps a bit too common these days. Maybe get the Allen & Heath Xone32 with a seperate effects unit for something different?

And regarding the Pioneer DJM300, the DJM600 has more channels and has an in-built effects unit, that's the only difference.

If money was no object, I'd recommend the Allen & Heath Xone92 with a seperate effects unit!

Nice 8)

At the end of the day though, the Pioneer isn't the industry standard for nothing; it is still a solid buy.

 

[nish]

quality reply from the bart.