russ said:its awful. childish ... garish pictures ... g2 is like a comic.
russ said:its awful. childish typeface, garish pictures, thin paper, g2 is like a comic.
good size though.
naddyz said:it'll be interesting to see if they make any money out of it. Not tried it yet, don't particularly like the new logo, but I'm sure I'll get used to it.
Colour on every page though! oooooooh 8) 8)![]()
Holly G said:I went back to the tabloid Independent this morning.
jjinit said:naddyz said:it'll be interesting to see if they make any money out of it. Not tried it yet, don't particularly like the new logo, but I'm sure I'll get used to it.
Colour on every page though! oooooooh 8) 8)![]()
they have took abit of a pounding developing it, and have dropped in circulation, but they reckon it will have paid for itself in the next 12 mths and the circulation will go back up.
synchronicity said:Interesting one this - I personally like it, especially the weekend Review supplement. I thought G2 looked silly and titchy last monday, but it's grown on me a bit since...
is it cool? - Yes.
is it gonna get their circulation up past the 400,000 mark again long term? - Hmmm, remains to be seen. They put on 40% on the first day, but will that be sustainable? I'd say the best they can hope for is getting some of the indy dissenters back on board, but with a product which is still less than commuter friendly, is that likely?
They may have taken on an ex-times journo, but that doesn't mean the your average Torygraph reader is gonna suddenly see the light.
Interesting times in national press....
Any Londoners seen CityAM by the way? What are your thoughts (if any) on that?
synchronicity said:jjinit said:naddyz said:it'll be interesting to see if they make any money out of it. Not tried it yet, don't particularly like the new logo, but I'm sure I'll get used to it.
Colour on every page though! oooooooh 8) 8)![]()
they have took abit of a pounding developing it, and have dropped in circulation, but they reckon it will have paid for itself in the next 12 mths and the circulation will go back up.
they paid 80 million for those new presses tho...![]()
at a time when ad revenues are soft across the board that's a pretty big gamble.
Robder said:I don't think I'm grown up enough to read papers.
russ said:city am's problem seems to be that they hand them out when people are LEAVING the tube network.
metro works coz people read it ON the tube (and leave them there)
peeps who need financial info will get it earlier from the ft or from reuters etc once they get to work.
'theguardian' on sat was better but i'm still not convinced the new format is a winner. i've gone back to the indy.