A year ago, places like Soulseek were rife with dance music as many labels just hadn't got their arse in gear in terms of legal digital downloads, but 2005 has seen a VAST improvement.
I'm in two minds about illegal downloading. First off, let me say that I have and do do it. Hardly ever for dance music, only for other styles of music and I can HAND ON HEART say that anything I have liked, I have went out and bought, as I like physically having the product in my collection. Dance music wise, the quailty of sites like djdownload.com and beatport over the last 6 months has been amazing, so many good tracks of all genres, meaning i'm picking up more tunes than ever, and lots of very upfront material.
On the other hand, once a dance record has gone past the point of shifting copies (eg well past its promo and release dates, eg 8-12 months), I wouldn't, as a producer, be overly concerned about tracks being up on Soulseek - as the people downloading wouldn't have bought it anyway, and your music is still reaching people it wouldn't have before.
This argument has been brought up before and I think there's some substance in it; there's a sizeable majority of people who only download music that they wouldn't have normally bought - so this is only actually CREATING interest in the artist. However with the increase in CD-only dj's, there must still be people out there with track collections purely made up of illegally downloaded music.
I know there are a few from the industry on this board - would be interesting to hear your views, and also from the other side, e.g. the punter.
I'm in two minds about illegal downloading. First off, let me say that I have and do do it. Hardly ever for dance music, only for other styles of music and I can HAND ON HEART say that anything I have liked, I have went out and bought, as I like physically having the product in my collection. Dance music wise, the quailty of sites like djdownload.com and beatport over the last 6 months has been amazing, so many good tracks of all genres, meaning i'm picking up more tunes than ever, and lots of very upfront material.
On the other hand, once a dance record has gone past the point of shifting copies (eg well past its promo and release dates, eg 8-12 months), I wouldn't, as a producer, be overly concerned about tracks being up on Soulseek - as the people downloading wouldn't have bought it anyway, and your music is still reaching people it wouldn't have before.
This argument has been brought up before and I think there's some substance in it; there's a sizeable majority of people who only download music that they wouldn't have normally bought - so this is only actually CREATING interest in the artist. However with the increase in CD-only dj's, there must still be people out there with track collections purely made up of illegally downloaded music.
I know there are a few from the industry on this board - would be interesting to hear your views, and also from the other side, e.g. the punter.