Blaze/Barbara Tucker-Most Precious Love (Dennis Ferrer mix)
- Thread starter x-amount
- Start date
Andy Daniell
New Member
this is gonna be MASSIVE!!!
coming soon on a over-rated too commercial money grabbing label
near you soon!
coming soon on a over-rated too commercial money grabbing label
near you soon!Andy Daniell
New Member
thats the chap, with big gospel vocals. amazing record. best thing i've heard all year!!
Andy Daniell
New Member
jon_d said:
gonna be big, was my most rated tune on the radio show last week!
Just like to re-iterate
This tune is fcuking brilliant. Just pipped IMO Woz Not Woz as tune of the year. No question.
Woooooaaaaahhhhhh oooooaaaaahhhhhh Preeeeeeccccciiioooouuuuussssss
Precious Loooooovvvvveeee
Havent felt like this about a new tune for ages. There's no better feeling in the world!
This tune is fcuking brilliant. Just pipped IMO Woz Not Woz as tune of the year. No question.
Woooooaaaaahhhhhh oooooaaaaahhhhhh Preeeeeeccccciiioooouuuuussssss
Precious Loooooovvvvveeee
Havent felt like this about a new tune for ages. There's no better feeling in the world!
i know u love this one x-amount but i'm sorry to say i dont particularly like this. I like blaze a fair bit but I think this mix isnt half as good quality as the original blaze productions. Blaze productions always have plenty of soul and groove in them. Lots of live instruments and fantastic keys.
This mix doesnt have any of that. The percussion is weak, its just one loop over and over throughout the song. The piano is taccy IMO, maybe i'm being too sceptical but its so electronic... Sounds like a crud yamaha keyboard. Its also too 'tight' there's no 'feeling' compared to the original. The only thing its got going for it is the strings but even that just loops. If you get the chance to remix a blaze track (and Tucker!!) at least make the effort to get some session players in.
I prefer this...
original:
http://217.158.65.110/MP3/SF162881-01-02-02.mp3
Its not a bad track, it doesnt offend me but it sounds really rushed imo. Attention to detail just isn't there. Lots of people like it though so fair play
This mix doesnt have any of that. The percussion is weak, its just one loop over and over throughout the song. The piano is taccy IMO, maybe i'm being too sceptical but its so electronic... Sounds like a crud yamaha keyboard. Its also too 'tight' there's no 'feeling' compared to the original. The only thing its got going for it is the strings but even that just loops. If you get the chance to remix a blaze track (and Tucker!!) at least make the effort to get some session players in.
I prefer this...
original:
http://217.158.65.110/MP3/SF162881-01-02-02.mp3
Its not a bad track, it doesnt offend me but it sounds really rushed imo. Attention to detail just isn't there. Lots of people like it though so fair play
x-amount said:monkehUK said:hmm, it's not 'that' good...
Oh, to be as nonchalant as you!
Sorry mate but I haven't heard it whilst tatered like you have, it only sounds 'ok' when im straight and in the comfort of my own home... After I've heard it on a proper system and under the influence I'll comment again!
monkehUK said:NITEFLY said:
Its a Defected thing! Six DJs, one box of records!
No.
It's a Ministry thing. (IMO)
The only place I've ever seen such hammerings got. And it's usually a sign of something very very special.
And it's only happened to 4 or 5 tunes, ever. All MONTHS previous to their release dates, and each time it's been classic Ministry night.
x-amount said:monkehUK said:NITEFLY said:
Its a Defected thing! Six DJs, one box of records!
No.
It's a Ministry thing. (IMO)
The only place I've ever seen such hammerings got. And it's usually a sign of something very very special.
And it's only happened to 4 or 5 tunes, ever. All MONTHS previous to their release dates, and each time it's been classic Ministry night.
well said
