Aha! So one group is only posting truth and facts, Morillo did it!in fact, it's your allies in this thread who are posting drivel that can be best described as gossip
Aha! So one group is only posting truth and facts, Morillo did it!
...but the other group that is posting some doubts or contradicting facts.....gossip!
Confirmation bias in its utter form
Agreed mate.Im not sure if theres something lost in translation here, but some of the way you have worded this is very odd indeed.
"It was not appropriate to stay overnight..."
"The fairest thing to do...."
It sounds like you are saying, well she had it coming really... Maybe she shouldn't have put on a nice outfit or done her hair and make up so as not to make her more attractive to potential attackers?
Statistically most victims of abuse are known to their attackers, at least in the western world. Does it not occur to you that perhaps, as the long time friend of her partner, and being a colleague of hers, she maybe trusted him not to have sex with her while she was unconscious?
But then the whole Kirsten Knight story came up and I got some second thoughts. Morillo probably knew about all these stories himself, his image...so he knew he would never be able to defend himself in court? Or even if he was able to defend himself in court, his whole career would be over, no booker would ever attach his name to a event again. What if there indeed is something else at play?
Think or believe of it what you wantI'm going to put it to Elrow that he doesn't believe his own BS. He's assumed this position as forum pantomime villain, posting aboslute detriabe in just about every thread. He seems revel in it. I can no longer believe he genuinely believes any of it. We are here for his amusement
He also curiously claims to be highly experienced in a wide spectrum of industries. Take from that, what you will
Evidently it is easier than going to court to face your trials so can't be that difficult....
Lets face some FACTS:
1) A woman made a complaint of rape. Morillo denied even having sex with the woman in the police interview.
2) The woman had to go through a invasive DNA test to gather evidence, because she believed someone had sex with her while she was passed out.
3) Erick Morillos DNA is found inside her. When you couple this with Morillo saying they did not even have sex, Miami Police charge him with sexual battery.
4) It never gets to trial because Morillo does not let it happen.
The fact that you are 'doubting' any of this based on 'all sorts of shit flying around' is no better than tit for tat gossip.
May I encourage to lead the discussion back to the matter of debate if anyone is still interested? I am personally not a fan of cancel culture.
Could you or anyone else please indicate a source for point (1) above, second sentence? I think this is a crucial part of the story. All I found is that Morillo „denied the accusations“. Thank you.
Thanks. I will refrain from judging, but IF this reporting is correct, things look pretty clear imo.I've already linked it in this thread from the Miami Times, who quoted the actual arrest report.
Meanwhile, Miami Beach police responded to the scene of the incident and met with Morillo, who said he had spoken with his attorney prior to their arrival, according to the report. He agreed to give an oral DNA sample and a recorded statement, in which he denied raping the woman.
Morillo told police that while he never had sex with the victim, he did have sex with the other woman at his home. He said that afterward, he walked into his bedroom naked and was startled to see the woman asleep in his bed.
Agreed mate.
Sad state of affairs that women are constantly at risk.
I seen a thing recently were women were asked what they would do if men didn't exist for 24 hours...
Their answers were things like, go for a jog at night, go dancing, go for a walk with a friend, go to a bar and feel safe, go to the gym and wear what she wants..
I don't think it's normal for a engaged woman to stay in the home of a man who has just shown him a sexual interest.
You really appear to dig deep to prove your point, even if it means sharing content from wackos or extremists. On this thread, your attitude is quite the opposite, and you've presented yourself as a facts man who tows the Holy sanctity of the law. Again forgive me for finding that confusing
Would you personally convict anyone of rape based on these facts alone? Forget Morillo, assume it is a total stranger, and the only evidence you have are these 4 facts.Lets face some FACTS:
1) A woman made a complaint of rape. Morillo denied even having sex with the woman in the police interview.
2) The woman had to go through a invasive DNA test to gather evidence, because she believed someone had sex with her while she was passed out.
3) Erick Morillos DNA is found inside her. When you couple this with Morillo saying they did not even have sex, Miami Police charge him with sexual battery.
4) It never gets to trial because Morillo does not let it happen.
Would you personally convict anyone of rape based on these facts alone? Forget Morillo, assume it is a total stranger, and the only evidence you have are these 4 facts.