ok i wasnt party to all the evidence presented,for or against her case... i know this subject has already been thrashed out here!and i dont like to cast aspersions..but after all the so called damning evidence... 'acquitted'??
ok i wasnt party to all the evidence presented,for or against her case... i know this subject has already been thrashed out here!and i dont like to cast aspersions..but after all the so called damning evidence... 'acquitted'??
presumably you are referring to the recent trial she was involved in, where a girl of 2 was raped by her (baby p's mother) boyfried and he was convicted on the evidence of that girl, now aged 4? Now he's got the audacity to lodge an appeal.....................now this is where I cant understand how anyone can act as a defence for this monster?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.